@article{Draper2019,
title = {Trade, Inclusive Development, and the Global Order},
author = {Peter Draper, Andreas Freytag, Christoph Dörffel, Sebastian Schuhmann},
url = {https://globalsummitryproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Trade-Inclusive-Development-and-the-Global-Order.pdf},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guz001},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-04-13},
journal = {Global Summitry},
volume = {4},
number = {2},
pages = {30–49},
abstract = {Economic globalization has increasingly affected countries across the world, through participation in global value chains (GVCs) and helping to lift over one billion human beings out of extreme poverty since 1990. However, there are still too many people living in poverty, even in rich countries, and so concerns over exclusion of certain groups from the gains of economic globalization are rising internationally. Using the concept of inclusiveness based on Amartya Sen’s capability approach, we find that G20 countries perform better than non-G20 countries. We then review how economic theory contributes to understanding the causes of (missing) inclusiveness by reviewing the literature pertaining to five drivers: growth, technology, structural change, trade, and political economy. Overall, domestic policies tailored to specific national circumstances are the main instruments for promoting inclusiveness. The danger is that in pursuing these domestic policies, states may undermine international arrangements constituting the liberal economic order. We argue that the liberal economic order generates insufficient global governance because there is always a fraction of countries opposing global policy coordination as they believe it harms them, and that this group of countries is increasing propelled by the surge of populism. This dynamic implies that global governance focus will increasingly shift to “coalitions of the willing”, rendering multilateralism an increasingly challenging, and a la carte, proposition.},
keywords = {Development, Equality, Global Order, Inclusive, Inequality, Structural Change, Trade},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Draper2018,
title = {Trade, Inclusive Development, and the Global Order },
author = {Peter Draper and Andreas Freytag and Christoph Dörffel and Sebastian Schuhmann},
url = {http://globalsummitry.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GSP-4.1.3.pdf},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guz001},
issn = {https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guz001},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-00-00},
journal = {Global Summitry},
volume = {4},
number = {1},
pages = {30-49},
abstract = {Economic globalization has increasingly affected countries across the world, through participation in global value chains (GVCs) and helping to lift over one billion human beings out of extreme poverty since 1990. However, there are still too many people living in poverty, even in rich countries, and so concerns over exclusion of certain groups from the gains of economic globalization are rising internationally. Using the concept of inclusiveness based on Amartya Sen’s capability approach, we find that G20 countries perform better than non-G20 countries. We then review how economic theory contributes to understanding the causes of (missing) inclusiveness by reviewing the literature pertaining to five drivers: growth, technology, structural change, trade, and political economy. Overall, domestic policies tailored to specific national circumstances are the main instruments for promoting inclusiveness. The danger is that in pursuing these domestic policies, states may undermine international arrangements constituting the liberal economic order. We argue that the liberal economic order generates insufficient global governance because there is always a fraction of countries opposing global policy coordination as they believe it harms them, and that this group of countries is increasing propelled by the surge of populism. This dynamic implies that global governance focus will increasingly shift to “coalitions of the willing”, rendering multilateralism an increasingly challenging, and a la carte, proposition.

},
note = {Article},
keywords = {Development, Equality, Global Order, GVC, IDI, Inclusive, Inclusive Development Index, Inclusiveness, Inequality, Structural Change, Technology, Trade},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Alexandroff2015,
title = {Global Summitry: Its Meaning and Scope Part One},
author = {Alan S. Alexandroff and Donald Brean},
url = {http://globalsummitry.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GSP-1.1.1-2.pdf},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guv006},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-20},
journal = {Global Summitry },
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {1-26},
abstract = {This article by the Senior Editors describes the scope and areas of interest of the new Global Summitry journal. Given the breadth of the topic, the article is divided into two parts, with the second to appear in the next issue. The narrative begins with an account of the current state of the global order and goes on to develop a working definition of global summitry. It looks at various facets of the concept with particular emphasis on the fact that global summitry is more than periodic, highly visible gatherings of leaders. We propose the “Iceberg Theory” of global summitry, metaphor for the substantial ongoing below-the-surface activity that gives support to the leaders’ ensemble. We distinguish global summitry from global governance while raising to prominence the many actors and international arrangements in global governance today. The article outlines the historical evolution of summitry, highlighting “revolutionary” changes over the last two hundred years. As its subtitle signals, the Journal is committed to a multidisciplinary approach that will engage economists, lawyers, and historians as well as experts in international relations.},
note = {Feature},
keywords = {Actors, Arrangements, Bretton Woods System, Cooperation, Definition, Disorder, global governance, Global Order, global summitry, Human Conduct, Iceberg Theory, League of Nations, Order, Power, Rise of the Informals, UN},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}