Directory Search
Scroll further down to browse by year.
1. | Weiss, Thomas G: The UN and Multilateralism under Siege in the “Age of Trump” . In: Global Summitry, 4 (1), pp. 1-17, 2018, ISSN: 2058-7449, (Article). (Type: Journal Article | Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: 45th, Age of Trump, America first, better world, Donald, Donald Trump, existential, existential threat, first avenue, Multilateralism, national security, president, Trump, UN, United Nations) @article{Weiss2018, title = {The UN and Multilateralism under Siege in the “Age of Trump” }, author = {Thomas G Weiss}, url = {http://globalsummitry.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GSP-4.1.1.pdf}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guy013}, issn = { 2058-7449}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-00-00}, journal = {Global Summitry}, volume = {4}, number = {1}, pages = {1-17}, abstract = {This essay poses two questions: “Would the World Be Better without the UN?” and “Would the World Be Better without Donald Trump?” The answers are “No” and “Yes.” It begins by discussing the UN’s value and continues by probing the historical context of U.S. approaches to multilateralism and Washington’s unhesitating leadership during World War II, an era as fraught as ours. It then analyzes the implications of the Trump Administration’s “America First” policy on the United Nations and considers the possibilities for concerted international action without Washington. It concludes by examining the odds that the world body can become fitter-for-purpose. }, note = {Article}, keywords = {45th, Age of Trump, America first, better world, Donald, Donald Trump, existential, existential threat, first avenue, Multilateralism, national security, president, Trump, UN, United Nations}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This essay poses two questions: “Would the World Be Better without the UN?” and “Would the World Be Better without Donald Trump?” The answers are “No” and “Yes.” It begins by discussing the UN’s value and continues by probing the historical context of U.S. approaches to multilateralism and Washington’s unhesitating leadership during World War II, an era as fraught as ours. It then analyzes the implications of the Trump Administration’s “America First” policy on the United Nations and considers the possibilities for concerted international action without Washington. It concludes by examining the odds that the world body can become fitter-for-purpose. |
2. | Alexandroff, Alan S; Brean, Donald: Global Summitry: Its Meaning and Scope Part One. In: Global Summitry , 1 (1), pp. 1-26, 2015, (Feature). (Type: Journal Article | Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Actors, Arrangements, Bretton Woods System, Cooperation, Definition, Disorder, global governance, Global Order, global summitry, Human Conduct, Iceberg Theory, League of Nations, Order, Power, Rise of the Informals, UN) @article{Alexandroff2015, title = {Global Summitry: Its Meaning and Scope Part One}, author = {Alan S. Alexandroff and Donald Brean}, url = {http://globalsummitry.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GSP-1.1.1-2.pdf}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guv006}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-07-20}, journal = {Global Summitry }, volume = {1}, number = {1}, pages = {1-26}, abstract = {This article by the Senior Editors describes the scope and areas of interest of the new Global Summitry journal. Given the breadth of the topic, the article is divided into two parts, with the second to appear in the next issue. The narrative begins with an account of the current state of the global order and goes on to develop a working definition of global summitry. It looks at various facets of the concept with particular emphasis on the fact that global summitry is more than periodic, highly visible gatherings of leaders. We propose the “Iceberg Theory” of global summitry, metaphor for the substantial ongoing below-the-surface activity that gives support to the leaders’ ensemble. We distinguish global summitry from global governance while raising to prominence the many actors and international arrangements in global governance today. The article outlines the historical evolution of summitry, highlighting “revolutionary” changes over the last two hundred years. As its subtitle signals, the Journal is committed to a multidisciplinary approach that will engage economists, lawyers, and historians as well as experts in international relations.}, note = {Feature}, keywords = {Actors, Arrangements, Bretton Woods System, Cooperation, Definition, Disorder, global governance, Global Order, global summitry, Human Conduct, Iceberg Theory, League of Nations, Order, Power, Rise of the Informals, UN}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This article by the Senior Editors describes the scope and areas of interest of the new Global Summitry journal. Given the breadth of the topic, the article is divided into two parts, with the second to appear in the next issue. The narrative begins with an account of the current state of the global order and goes on to develop a working definition of global summitry. It looks at various facets of the concept with particular emphasis on the fact that global summitry is more than periodic, highly visible gatherings of leaders. We propose the “Iceberg Theory” of global summitry, metaphor for the substantial ongoing below-the-surface activity that gives support to the leaders’ ensemble. We distinguish global summitry from global governance while raising to prominence the many actors and international arrangements in global governance today. The article outlines the historical evolution of summitry, highlighting “revolutionary” changes over the last two hundred years. As its subtitle signals, the Journal is committed to a multidisciplinary approach that will engage economists, lawyers, and historians as well as experts in international relations. |
2018 |
Weiss, Thomas G The UN and Multilateralism under Siege in the “Age of Trump” Journal Article Global Summitry, 4 (1), pp. 1-17, 2018, ISSN: 2058-7449, (Article). @article{Weiss2018, title = {The UN and Multilateralism under Siege in the “Age of Trump” }, author = {Thomas G Weiss}, url = {http://globalsummitry.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GSP-4.1.1.pdf}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guy013}, issn = { 2058-7449}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-00-00}, journal = {Global Summitry}, volume = {4}, number = {1}, pages = {1-17}, abstract = {This essay poses two questions: “Would the World Be Better without the UN?” and “Would the World Be Better without Donald Trump?” The answers are “No” and “Yes.” It begins by discussing the UN’s value and continues by probing the historical context of U.S. approaches to multilateralism and Washington’s unhesitating leadership during World War II, an era as fraught as ours. It then analyzes the implications of the Trump Administration’s “America First” policy on the United Nations and considers the possibilities for concerted international action without Washington. It concludes by examining the odds that the world body can become fitter-for-purpose. }, note = {Article}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This essay poses two questions: “Would the World Be Better without the UN?” and “Would the World Be Better without Donald Trump?” The answers are “No” and “Yes.” It begins by discussing the UN’s value and continues by probing the historical context of U.S. approaches to multilateralism and Washington’s unhesitating leadership during World War II, an era as fraught as ours. It then analyzes the implications of the Trump Administration’s “America First” policy on the United Nations and considers the possibilities for concerted international action without Washington. It concludes by examining the odds that the world body can become fitter-for-purpose. |
Sorry, no publications matched your criteria.
Sorry, no publications matched your criteria.
2015 |
Alexandroff, Alan S; Brean, Donald Global Summitry: Its Meaning and Scope Part One Journal Article Global Summitry , 1 (1), pp. 1-26, 2015, (Feature). @article{Alexandroff2015, title = {Global Summitry: Its Meaning and Scope Part One}, author = {Alan S. Alexandroff and Donald Brean}, url = {http://globalsummitry.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GSP-1.1.1-2.pdf}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guv006}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-07-20}, journal = {Global Summitry }, volume = {1}, number = {1}, pages = {1-26}, abstract = {This article by the Senior Editors describes the scope and areas of interest of the new Global Summitry journal. Given the breadth of the topic, the article is divided into two parts, with the second to appear in the next issue. The narrative begins with an account of the current state of the global order and goes on to develop a working definition of global summitry. It looks at various facets of the concept with particular emphasis on the fact that global summitry is more than periodic, highly visible gatherings of leaders. We propose the “Iceberg Theory” of global summitry, metaphor for the substantial ongoing below-the-surface activity that gives support to the leaders’ ensemble. We distinguish global summitry from global governance while raising to prominence the many actors and international arrangements in global governance today. The article outlines the historical evolution of summitry, highlighting “revolutionary” changes over the last two hundred years. As its subtitle signals, the Journal is committed to a multidisciplinary approach that will engage economists, lawyers, and historians as well as experts in international relations.}, note = {Feature}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This article by the Senior Editors describes the scope and areas of interest of the new Global Summitry journal. Given the breadth of the topic, the article is divided into two parts, with the second to appear in the next issue. The narrative begins with an account of the current state of the global order and goes on to develop a working definition of global summitry. It looks at various facets of the concept with particular emphasis on the fact that global summitry is more than periodic, highly visible gatherings of leaders. We propose the “Iceberg Theory” of global summitry, metaphor for the substantial ongoing below-the-surface activity that gives support to the leaders’ ensemble. We distinguish global summitry from global governance while raising to prominence the many actors and international arrangements in global governance today. The article outlines the historical evolution of summitry, highlighting “revolutionary” changes over the last two hundred years. As its subtitle signals, the Journal is committed to a multidisciplinary approach that will engage economists, lawyers, and historians as well as experts in international relations. |
Sorry, no publications matched your criteria.