Directory Search
Scroll further down to browse by year.
| 1. | Berger, Axel; Evenett, Simon J: The Trump-Induced G20 Stress Test on Trade: Did the German Presidency Pass? . In: Global Summitry, 3 (2), pp. 124-140, 2017, ISSN: 2058-7449, (Article). (Type: Journal Article | Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: G20, G7 Summit, German G20 Summit, German Presidency, German Priority, Hamburg, Hamburg Summit, National Trade Policy Formation, Stress-test, Trump Induced) @article{Berger2017b, title = {The Trump-Induced G20 Stress Test on Trade: Did the German Presidency Pass? }, author = {Axel Berger and Simon J Evenett}, url = {http://globalsummitry.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GSP-3.2.3.pdf}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guy002}, issn = { 2058-7449}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-00-00}, journal = {Global Summitry}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, pages = {124-140}, abstract = {At the beginning of its G20 year, the German Presidency attached little priority to trade policy. That stance had to change with the ascension to the office of a U.S. President unwilling to follow the diplomatic niceties on the trade policy of his predecessors. Moreover, following the U.S. withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in the first quarter of 2017, the fear grew that election-era protectionist slogans might be converted into action by the United States. This article assesses how effectively the German Presidency and the G20 process, in general, managed the Trump-induced “stress test” on trade policy. The non-binding form of international economic cooperation, evident with the Leaders’ Summit appears, in our opinion, to have been only partially successful. }, note = {Article}, keywords = {G20, G7 Summit, German G20 Summit, German Presidency, German Priority, Hamburg, Hamburg Summit, National Trade Policy Formation, Stress-test, Trump Induced}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } At the beginning of its G20 year, the German Presidency attached little priority to trade policy. That stance had to change with the ascension to the office of a U.S. President unwilling to follow the diplomatic niceties on the trade policy of his predecessors. Moreover, following the U.S. withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in the first quarter of 2017, the fear grew that election-era protectionist slogans might be converted into action by the United States. This article assesses how effectively the German Presidency and the G20 process, in general, managed the Trump-induced “stress test” on trade policy. The non-binding form of international economic cooperation, evident with the Leaders’ Summit appears, in our opinion, to have been only partially successful. |
Sorry, no publications matched your criteria.
2017 |
Berger, Axel; Evenett, Simon J The Trump-Induced G20 Stress Test on Trade: Did the German Presidency Pass? Journal Article Global Summitry, 3 (2), pp. 124-140, 2017, ISSN: 2058-7449, (Article). @article{Berger2017b, title = {The Trump-Induced G20 Stress Test on Trade: Did the German Presidency Pass? }, author = {Axel Berger and Simon J Evenett}, url = {http://globalsummitry.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GSP-3.2.3.pdf}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guy002}, issn = { 2058-7449}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-00-00}, journal = {Global Summitry}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, pages = {124-140}, abstract = {At the beginning of its G20 year, the German Presidency attached little priority to trade policy. That stance had to change with the ascension to the office of a U.S. President unwilling to follow the diplomatic niceties on the trade policy of his predecessors. Moreover, following the U.S. withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in the first quarter of 2017, the fear grew that election-era protectionist slogans might be converted into action by the United States. This article assesses how effectively the German Presidency and the G20 process, in general, managed the Trump-induced “stress test” on trade policy. The non-binding form of international economic cooperation, evident with the Leaders’ Summit appears, in our opinion, to have been only partially successful. }, note = {Article}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } At the beginning of its G20 year, the German Presidency attached little priority to trade policy. That stance had to change with the ascension to the office of a U.S. President unwilling to follow the diplomatic niceties on the trade policy of his predecessors. Moreover, following the U.S. withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in the first quarter of 2017, the fear grew that election-era protectionist slogans might be converted into action by the United States. This article assesses how effectively the German Presidency and the G20 process, in general, managed the Trump-induced “stress test” on trade policy. The non-binding form of international economic cooperation, evident with the Leaders’ Summit appears, in our opinion, to have been only partially successful. |
Sorry, no publications matched your criteria.
Sorry, no publications matched your criteria.
Sorry, no publications matched your criteria.