Directory Search
Scroll further down to browse by year.
1. | Weiss, Thomas G: The UN and Multilateralism under Siege in the “Age of Trump” . In: Global Summitry, 4 (1), pp. 1-17, 2018, ISSN: 2058-7449, (Article). (Type: Journal Article | Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: 45th, Age of Trump, America first, better world, Donald, Donald Trump, existential, existential threat, first avenue, Multilateralism, national security, president, Trump, UN, United Nations) @article{Weiss2018, title = {The UN and Multilateralism under Siege in the “Age of Trump” }, author = {Thomas G Weiss}, url = {http://globalsummitry.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GSP-4.1.1.pdf}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guy013}, issn = { 2058-7449}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-00-00}, journal = {Global Summitry}, volume = {4}, number = {1}, pages = {1-17}, abstract = {This essay poses two questions: “Would the World Be Better without the UN?” and “Would the World Be Better without Donald Trump?” The answers are “No” and “Yes.” It begins by discussing the UN’s value and continues by probing the historical context of U.S. approaches to multilateralism and Washington’s unhesitating leadership during World War II, an era as fraught as ours. It then analyzes the implications of the Trump Administration’s “America First” policy on the United Nations and considers the possibilities for concerted international action without Washington. It concludes by examining the odds that the world body can become fitter-for-purpose. }, note = {Article}, keywords = {45th, Age of Trump, America first, better world, Donald, Donald Trump, existential, existential threat, first avenue, Multilateralism, national security, president, Trump, UN, United Nations}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This essay poses two questions: “Would the World Be Better without the UN?” and “Would the World Be Better without Donald Trump?” The answers are “No” and “Yes.” It begins by discussing the UN’s value and continues by probing the historical context of U.S. approaches to multilateralism and Washington’s unhesitating leadership during World War II, an era as fraught as ours. It then analyzes the implications of the Trump Administration’s “America First” policy on the United Nations and considers the possibilities for concerted international action without Washington. It concludes by examining the odds that the world body can become fitter-for-purpose. |
2018 |
Weiss, Thomas G The UN and Multilateralism under Siege in the “Age of Trump” Journal Article Global Summitry, 4 (1), pp. 1-17, 2018, ISSN: 2058-7449, (Article). @article{Weiss2018, title = {The UN and Multilateralism under Siege in the “Age of Trump” }, author = {Thomas G Weiss}, url = {http://globalsummitry.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GSP-4.1.1.pdf}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guy013}, issn = { 2058-7449}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-00-00}, journal = {Global Summitry}, volume = {4}, number = {1}, pages = {1-17}, abstract = {This essay poses two questions: “Would the World Be Better without the UN?” and “Would the World Be Better without Donald Trump?” The answers are “No” and “Yes.” It begins by discussing the UN’s value and continues by probing the historical context of U.S. approaches to multilateralism and Washington’s unhesitating leadership during World War II, an era as fraught as ours. It then analyzes the implications of the Trump Administration’s “America First” policy on the United Nations and considers the possibilities for concerted international action without Washington. It concludes by examining the odds that the world body can become fitter-for-purpose. }, note = {Article}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This essay poses two questions: “Would the World Be Better without the UN?” and “Would the World Be Better without Donald Trump?” The answers are “No” and “Yes.” It begins by discussing the UN’s value and continues by probing the historical context of U.S. approaches to multilateralism and Washington’s unhesitating leadership during World War II, an era as fraught as ours. It then analyzes the implications of the Trump Administration’s “America First” policy on the United Nations and considers the possibilities for concerted international action without Washington. It concludes by examining the odds that the world body can become fitter-for-purpose. |
Sorry, no publications matched your criteria.
Sorry, no publications matched your criteria.
Sorry, no publications matched your criteria.
Sorry, no publications matched your criteria.